Attorney Not Liable For Failing To Act Beyond Scope of Retainer
On January 30,2019, the appellate court covering Manhattan granted a law firm's motion to dismiss a legal malpractice action because there was a limited retainer agreement. The client had been expelled from the New York College of Osteopathic Medicine. The law firm agreed in writing to represent the client for free but only to "investigate and consider options that may be available to urge reconsideration of your dismissal." The retainer agreement specifically ruled out any obligation to commence litigation or even threaten it. The College refused to reconsider the client's expulsion and he decided to sue the law firm for failing to file suit. The Court held: "An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer." Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 2019 WL 362266
Comments
There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.
Leave a Comment